O(1) is crucial because of K-independent hashing, but there is the bug.
i≠ j, k=1
Symmetrization is the optimization to solve this difficulty.
There are two shapes.
The associated symmetric form may take half-integer values.
(p+q)/2
A set of point pairs {(p1,q1),・・・,(pm,qm)} is given on the boundary of a shape.
T is transformation.
T=(Θ,d)
T'(p+dp)=q+dq
∴
E is still expectation. The boundary will be getting smaller like your fingerprints or DNA. O(1) is the worst-case execution time (WCET). I have quantum computers in my brain because of O(1), but nobody cares. You need the faster one to count prime numbers, although XP is enough for me. C++ is hard to use in Windows 10. I believe in your evolution.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿